Home   News   Article

Subscribe Now

Nottinghamshire county councillors divided over plans to spent over £400k to improve virtual committee meetings



More news, no ads

LEARN MORE


Councillors were divided over plans to spend more than £400,000 to improve the quality of virtual meetings from the council chamber.

Nottinghamshire County Council documents state the current equipment, which was approved before the pandemic struck, is outdated and unsuitable.

It proposes to spend a total of £437,341 on new equipment including large, mounted wall displays to allow officers to attend meetings virtually while tracking cameras would be installed to focus on councillors when they speak.

County Hall, home of Nottinghamshire County Council. (54207581)
County Hall, home of Nottinghamshire County Council. (54207581)

But some members opposed the plans, with one saying he could not justify the cost when he was supporting young people in his ward to access food.

Chair of the economic development and asset management committee Keith Girling said the plans were about democracy and would hold councillors to account.

Six voted for the plans, two against and three abstained.

Nottinghamshire county councillor Keith Girling.
Nottinghamshire county councillor Keith Girling.

Mr Girling told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: “At the full council meeting we had 70 people watching the live stream.

“The quality and standard of the live streaming is not sufficient at the minute to see and hear councillors debating.

“It is very difficult for councillors to contribute which is also important.

“People deserve to see how their councillors behave in a council meeting, that is an added bonus.

“We have saved over a million pounds on expenses claims during the pandemic for travel.”

He went on: “It’s really important, especially when you are looking at social services and adult social care, that the quality of those conversations can be understood and heard.”

Member David Shaw said: “This is an awful lot of money, it is way beyond what I was expecting for a microphone, a TV stand and internet connection.

“I am having to support young people in my division to feed them.

“I cannot justify spending this on internet connection.”

County Hall. (54308109)
County Hall. (54308109)

Mr Girling replied: “It is not a couple of microphones and internet connection. It is a lot of equipment.

“It is bringing us into this century. This is about openness, transparency and democracy.

“Anybody that doesn’t think we should be doing that, I worry about, to be frank.”

Kate Foale said: “We’ve all experienced meetings in this chamber where the kit hasn’t really worked, it is very difficult.

“The big concern is that it is an awful lot of money.”

Roger Upton added: “I don’t personally think £437,000 or thereabouts is a massive amount of money given the context of this authority and its budget.

“I can’t see half the time, I can’t hear half the time. If it doesn’t change I won’t be coming back in four years time.”

Documents state the costs will be fully funded from a covid funding grant.

It says £335,269.53 would be spent to improve equipment within the council chamber and the Rufford Suite, while a further £102,072.20 would be invested to provide technology in committee rooms B and C.

The plans will now be discussed by the council’s finance committee.



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More